Biden’s USDA officially caught in an explicit racial discrimination scheme against white farmers, systematically excluding them from loan forgiveness programs while defying federal court orders.
At a Glance
- A whistleblower revealed the USDA selectively forgave loans for minority farmers while deliberately excluding white farmers
- The American Rescue Plan Act offered debt relief exclusively to “socially disadvantaged” farmers (defined as minorities), later ruled unconstitutional by federal courts
- Despite the court ruling, the Biden administration allegedly continued discriminatory practices by informing only minority farmers about replacement programs
- White farmer James Dunlap stated the loan forgiveness was explicitly based on race, not financial need
- USDA officials deny discrimination claims despite documented evidence of racial exclusion
Racial Discrimination Disguised as “Equity”
The Biden administration’s USDA has been caught red-handed implementing what appears to be a textbook example of racial discrimination against white farmers, all while wrapping it in the now-familiar packaging of “equity” and “social justice.” A whistleblower has come forward with damning allegations that the department deliberately excluded white farmers from loan forgiveness programs, creating a two-tier system of agricultural relief based solely on skin color. The scheme was apparently so blatantly discriminatory that officials tried to keep it “hushed” to avoid public scrutiny, knowing full well that racial preferences in federal programs violate fundamental constitutional principles.
The allegations center around the American Rescue Plan Act, which initially allocated billions for loan forgiveness to “socially disadvantaged” farmers – a term that specifically excluded white farmers by definition. When challenged, a federal judge correctly ruled this racial discrimination unconstitutional, finding that white farmers “will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of race,” calling such harm “irreparable.” But apparently, the Biden administration views court orders as mere suggestions that can be ignored when politically inconvenient.
Defying the Courts and the Constitution
After the courts struck down their explicitly racist loan program, you might think the administration would correct course. Think again. Instead, they simply repackaged their discrimination into the Inflation Reduction Act and continued their two-tier system by another means. The most egregious part? According to whistleblower testimony, the USDA deliberately notified minority farmers about the new program while keeping white farmers in the dark. White farmer James Dunlap only learned about potential relief through a friend, not through any official government communication. This is government-sanctioned discrimination hiding in plain sight.
“‘It wasn’t about hardship,’ white farmer, James Dunlap, of Baker City, Oregon, told NewsNation about the loan forgiveness. ‘It wasn’t about financial situations. It was about that box you checked under ethnicity line under your application.'”
The federal judge couldn’t have been clearer when ruling the original program unconstitutional, stating it was “an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone.” Yet the Biden administration seems to believe they’re above such trivialities as constitutional constraints and federal court rulings. We’ve seen this same contempt for judicial authority with their illegal student loan forgiveness scheme – create a racially or politically motivated giveaway, have it struck down by courts, then find backdoor methods to implement it anyway. This isn’t governance; it’s lawlessness with a bureaucratic veneer.
The Denials and Deception
The USDA’s damage control operation is now in full swing, with officials like Scott Marlow dismissing the whistleblower’s claims as “absurd” and “inflated.” They’re trotting out carefully curated statistics claiming that 68% of recipients under one section of the new program identified as White. Notice the clever wordplay – this refers to just one section of the program after implementation was well underway, not the initial loan forgiveness that triggered the lawsuit. It’s the classic shell game of bureaucratic obfuscation, meant to confuse the public while the discrimination continues unabated.
“‘It was to pay off anyone who wasn’t a white male’s loan,’ the whistleblower said. ‘That was the only qualification for this loan forgiveness. They were trying to keep this hushed because of the obvious implications of race-based loan forgiveness.'”
This entire sordid affair isn’t just about agricultural policy – it’s a window into the Biden administration’s governing philosophy. When they talk about “equity,” they don’t mean equal treatment under law; they mean government-imposed racial preferences that deliberately disadvantage certain Americans based on immutable characteristics. They’re implementing a regime of systemic discrimination while accusing others of the very sin they’re committing. White farmers aren’t asking for special treatment – they’re simply demanding the equal protection guaranteed to all Americans under the Constitution. Anything less isn’t just bad policy; it’s un-American.
