Wind Projects Threaten Historic Sites Nationwide, Say Preservationists

Wind energy developments across the United States are sparking backlash over their impact on historic landmarks. Preservationists argue that these projects, while promoting renewable energy, risk irreparable harm to cultural and historical treasures.

In Idaho, the Lava Ridge Wind Project has drawn criticism for its proximity to the Minidoka National Historic Site. The site, a former concentration camp for Japanese Americans during World War II, relies on its isolated location to convey the suffering of those incarcerated there. Preservation groups fear that towering turbines will undermine this essential historical context.

Rhode Island’s Revolution Wind project has also faced resistance. Nearly 100 offshore turbines are planned near Newport, a region famed for its historic districts and coastal views. A lawsuit filed by preservationists argues that the project threatens the area’s architectural heritage and its long-standing connection to the Atlantic Ocean.

Wyoming is home to another contentious development, the Rail Tie Wind Project. Critics say the project endangers sites such as the Ames National Monument, a granite pyramid commemorating key figures in the transcontinental railroad. Preservationists warn that the industrialization of Wyoming’s prairies will compromise the region’s historical and cultural landscape.

Environmentalists have been accused of overlooking these impacts in favor of advancing renewable energy. Larry Behrens of Power the Future highlighted what he sees as a double standard, pointing out that concerns about historic sites are often ignored when green energy projects are involved.

The Rail Tie Wind Project, with turbines potentially reaching up to 675 feet, is expected to alter the open vistas of southern Wyoming. Preservationists say the project lacks transparency, as many details, including the total number of turbines, remain undisclosed.