Pennsylvania Recount Raises Alarms Over Democrat Election Tactics

The Pennsylvania Senate race between Republican Dave McCormick and Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) has triggered a statewide recount, sparking concerns over Democratic efforts to challenge the results. Despite McCormick’s lead of over 29,000 votes, Casey has refused to concede.

State law mandates a recount for races with margins under 0.5%, with the current margin at 0.43%. Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt announced that counties must begin the recount by Nov. 20 and report results by Nov. 27. The recount is expected to cost taxpayers over $1 million.

Democrats, led by attorney Marc Elias, are pushing to include contested ballots, drawing criticism from Republicans and election integrity advocates. The Wall Street Journal editorial board described the efforts as an attempt to “steal the seat” for Casey, accusing Democrats of undermining the democratic process.

McCormick, projected as the winner by several outlets, holds 48.93% of the vote compared to Casey’s 48.5%. Election experts suggest that the recount is unlikely to change the outcome, raising questions about the motives behind Democratic legal challenges.

Conservatives have expressed concern about the inclusion of ballots that may not meet legal requirements, warning that such actions could erode trust in the electoral process. This recount has become a test case for broader debates over election laws and procedures.

The results, expected just before Thanksgiving, will determine Pennsylvania’s next senator and set a precedent for how future election disputes are handled. Republicans are calling for transparency and strict adherence to the law to protect the integrity of the vote.