Crooks’ Deadly Plan EXPOSED: FBI Missed It!

November 20, 2025

The FBI’s claim of ignorance about Trump shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks unravels as mounting evidence reveals a disturbing pattern of missed intelligence that federal agencies apparently overlooked or ignored.

Story Highlights

Thomas Crooks conducted extensive online research on Trump and past assassinations while building explosives
Law enforcement observed and photographed Crooks acting suspiciously hours before the shooting but failed to intervene
FBI forensic analysis after the attack revealed a digital footprint that should have triggered threat assessments
The assassination attempt exposed critical gaps in intelligence sharing between federal and local agencies

The Digital Trail Hidden in Plain Sight

Thomas Matthew Crooks didn’t operate in complete darkness. The 20-year-old engineering student left digital breadcrumbs across the internet that painted a clear picture of escalating obsession with political violence. FBI analysis revealed extensive searches for Trump, Biden, and detailed research into historical assassinations. Yet somehow, this pattern escaped detection by the very agencies tasked with identifying exactly these types of threats.

The scope of Crooks’s preparation extended far beyond casual curiosity. He registered for the July 13 rally six days earlier, conducted drone surveillance of the venue, and practiced at shooting ranges in the days leading up to the attack. Intelligence analysts train specifically to identify these behavioral indicators, making their absence from any threat assessment all the more puzzling.

Global Bombshell: Would-Be Trump Assassin Thomas Crooks Had Gigantic Internet Footprint Calling for Public Executions and Political Assassinations

Starting With the Biden FBI and Continuing Into the Kash Patel Era, the Bureau Bizarrely Claimed That Crooks Had “Zero” Internet… pic.twitter.com/onHLAElMJI

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) November 18, 2025

Security Theater Meets Deadly Reality

The timeline of July 13 reads like a security manual on how not to protect a former president. At 5:14 p.m., a Secret Service countersniper photographed Crooks and designated him as suspicious. Local law enforcement monitored his movements as he positioned himself with clear sight lines to Trump’s podium. Despite these observations, no coordinated response prevented Crooks from opening fire.

This wasn’t a split-second decision that caught everyone off guard. Law enforcement had eyes on Crooks for extended periods, yet somehow he still managed to evade searches and reach his firing position. The disconnect between observation and action reveals systemic failures that go beyond simple human error. When agencies identify threats but fail to neutralize them, the entire security apparatus demands scrutiny.

The Explosive Evidence Nobody Saw Coming

Perhaps most damning is what investigators found after bullets started flying. Crooks didn’t just bring a rifle to the rally. Explosives discovered at his home and in his vehicle demonstrated months of preparation that should have triggered multiple agency alerts. The materials and methods required for bomb-making typically generate digital footprints that counterterrorism units monitor continuously.

The sophistication of Crooks’s planning suggests someone who understood security protocols well enough to circumvent them. His use of drones for reconnaissance, tactical positioning, and escape route planning indicates operational knowledge that typically comes from studying law enforcement methods. Yet federal agencies claim they detected nothing unusual about his activities or digital behavior patterns.

Questions That Demand Answers

The gap between what agencies knew and what they acted upon raises fundamental questions about competence versus complicity. Either federal law enforcement lacks the basic capabilities to detect obvious threats, or institutional failures prevented appropriate responses to available intelligence. Neither explanation inspires confidence in America’s protective services.

Congressional oversight and public accountability become essential when security failures reach this magnitude. The American people deserve transparency about how a 20-year-old with obvious warning signs nearly assassinated a former president despite multiple agencies supposedly monitoring for exactly these scenarios. Until we understand what went wrong, we cannot trust that similar failures won’t occur again.